International Relations

A. That the theory entered international relations too recently to be considered an academic theory
B. That it is too similar to realism and so serves no function
C. That it is not sophisticated enough to be an academic theory
D. That the field focuses so heavily on identity and language that it ignores the urgent of whether those in the global south can eat, leaving this problem up to Western agencies to sort out

A. A place prone to liberal democracy and revolutionary feminism
B. An accurate depiction of the modern day Middle East and Asia, meaning that scholars and academics can rely solely on these ancient works
C. Lost in the past, prone to despotic rule and plagued by ‘odd’ cultural traditions
D. Too focused on historical facts and accurately portraying the experience of life in the region

A. When people with hybrid identities and cultures become diasporic, travelling physically from south to North to live
B. When people from different nations come together in a new country
C. When people from one nation immigrate en masse to another country
D. When people with hybrid identities and cultures become diasporic travelling physically from North to South to live

A. Yasser Arafat
B. Shaikh Ahmad Yasin
C. Khalid Mashaal
D. Ismail Haniyan

A. nineteenth Century European imperialism
B. twentieth Century decolonization
C. evolving international understandings of statehood and nationalism
D. All of these

A. After 1967 Arab-Israel War
B. After 1968 Arab-Israel War
C. After 1969 Arab-Israel War
D. After 1979 Arab-Israel War

A. Natan Yahoo
B. Aril Sharon
C. Bin Gorey
D. none of these

A. U.S.A
B. Britain
C. Germany
D. France

A. because of the danger of attack from Greece
B. because they had been promised independence after the war
C. because Arabs were not in the position to defend it by themselves
D. None of these

A. Hamas
B. Islamic Jihad
C. Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigade
D. Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO)