A. Governor-General had no authority to dissolve the Assembly
B. Assembly is sovereign body and Governor-general had no authority to dissolve it.
C. At that time constitution had not allowed to do it
D. None of them
Related Mcqs:
- On which grounds the dissolution of Constituent Assembly was challenged?
A. Assembly is sovereign body and Governor-General had no power to dissolve it
B. Governor-General is not competent authority to do it
C. Constitution does not allow the dissolution
D. During the session assembly can not be dissolved - The dissolution of Constituent Assembly was challenged by Maulvi Tamiz-ud-Din by its speaker in ________.
A. Sindh Chief Court and then Federal Court
B. Punjab Chief Court
C. Sindh Chief Court
D. Punjab Chief Court and then Federal Court of the Country - Name the speaker of the Constituent Assembly who challenged the Ghulam Mohammad’s decision of the dissolution of the Government of Khawaja Nazim-ud-Din?
A. Miraj Khalid
B. Maulvi Tamiz-ud-Din Khan
C. Khan Muhammad
D. Raheem Shah - The dissolution of Constituent Assembly was challenged by its speaker in:___________?
A. Sindh Chief Court
B. Punjab Chief Court
C. Sindh Chief Court & afterward Federal Court
D. Punjab Chief Court & afterward Federal Court - Malik Ghulam Muhammad dessolved the Constituent Assembly on the grounds of ________ .
A. Corruption
B. Inactivity and in competency
C. Both (a) and (b)
D. None of them - The Governor-General dissolved the Constituent Assembly on the grounds of:
A. Inactivity
B. Incompetency
C. Corruption & misdeeds
D. All of them - What was the advice of Federal Court to the Governor-General in the case of dissolution of Constituent Assembly?
A. Form a second Constituent Assembly immediately
B. Hold election for a second Assembly
C. Change the Constituent Assembly into the Legislature
D. Form a second Assembly within three months - In the case of Constituent Assembly’s dissolution the Federal Court set the judgment of the Sind Court aside on the technical ground that the Act by virtue of which the Sind Court issued the verdict was ‘not yet a law’ because it had not received the assent of:
A. Federal Court
B. Prime Minister
C. Governor-General
D. Law Minister - What was the judgment of sindh chief court in dissolution of Constituent Assembly case?
A. Dissolution is valid
B. It refer the case to the Federal Court
C. Dissolution was ultra vires and void
D. It dismiss the petition - What was the decision of Federal Court in the dissolution case of Constituent Assembly?
A. It upheld Governor-General’s decision
B. It upheld the Sindh Chief Court’s decision
C. It upheld the Sindh Chief Court’s decision
D. It ordered to re-constitute in Assembly
