A. There is a system of judicial review
B. There is a system of checks and balances
C. There is a difficult procedure for amendment
D. There is a theory of separation of powers
Related Mcqs:
- Which of the following countries has a very rigid constitution?
A. U.S.A.
B. India
C. U.K.
D. Australia - The advantage of rigid constitution is that:
A. It keeps pace with national progress
B. It guarantees permanence and stability
C. It adjusts itself with the passage of time
D. It is progressive - A rigid constitution:
A. Cannot be amended
B. Can be amended by the people as a whole
C. Can be amended like an ordinary law
D. Can be amended by a special procedure - A constitution which provided for a rigid distribution of powers between the Centre and its constituent units is known as:
A. Written constitution
B. A federal constitution
C. A rigid constitution
D. None of the above - Which one of the following is not a demerit of rigid constitution?
A. A rigid constitution cannot keep pace with the changed circumstances
B. A rigid constitution generally has a conservative character
C. A rigid constitution gives undue importance to the judiciary
D. A rigid constitution cannot properly safeguard the rights of the people - One of the serious disadvantage of a rigid constitution is that:
A. It shifts the balance of authority from legislature to judiciary
B. It does not reflect public opinion
C. It is not suited to federations
D. It can easily be tampered with - A constitution which provides for a rigid distribution of the power of the government between the centre and its constituent units is known as:
A. Written constitution
B. Federal constitution
C. Rigid constitution
D. Flexible constitution - In which Constitution the Objective Resolution (1949) was made operative part of the constitution by adding Article 2-A in the Constitution?
A. 1956
B. 1962
C. 1970(Interim)
D. 1973 - Conventions enable a rigid framework to be kept up with changing social needs and changing political ideas:
A. Jennings says
B. Dicey says
C. Holds worth says
D. None of them says - An unwritten constitution differs from written constitution in so far as it is:
A. Wholly unwritten
B. Adopted after obtaining sanction of the people
C. Very brief
D. Not adopted by a formal constituent body
