Constitutional Development And National Movement in Subcontinent

A. Governor-General
B. Governor
C. Secretary of State
D. Elected members

A. Indians had made sacrifices during World War I
B. In Congress power slipped to extremists
C. Indians continued to, be ill-treated abroad
D. Interests of Indian commercial classes during war were fully protected
E. It was felt that the Government of India was inelastic

A. Between the centre and the provinces
B. Between official and non-official members of the Council
C. Into reserved and transferred subjects
D. Between Governor and Governor-General

A. Central level
B. Provincial level
C. District level
D. Panchyat level

A. At the central level in India
B. In the position of Secretary of State in England
C. In the working of local self bodies
D. In the position of Governor-General in India
E. In the provinces in India

A. Morley-Minto Reforms
B. Montford Reforms
C. Act of provincial autonomy
D. None of these

A. There was strong official bloc in Imperial Legislative Council
B. Government deliberately championed the cause of vested interests
C. The administrtion was deliberately kept less centralised
D. Local bodies were not given much freedom
E. Classes were made to fight with each other

A. It was much above the expectations of the people
B. It created wide gulf between the Hindus and the Muslims
C. It introduced doubly indirect method of election
D. In it Franchise was very much limited
E. It it there were glaring inequalities between voters of different communities

A. 1861
B. 1892
C. 1909
D. 1919
E. 1935

A. Legislative Councils were permitted to discuss budget
B. Members of Legislative Councils could suggest changes in taxation proposals
C. Presiding Officer could not disallow any question
D. Members were allowed to put supplementary questions
E. Government could create other executive councils