Constitutional Development And National Movement in Subcontinent

A. India will be a republic
B. India will be divided into two parts
C. India will be unitary state
D. It will be compulsory for
E. It will be compulsory for princely states to join Pakistan

A. In it lower House was made more powerful than the upper one
B. In it upper House was made more powerful than the lower one
C. In it dyarchy was ended in the provinces
D. In it joining of Indian states in the federation was made optional

A. Dyarchy was retained in the provinces
B. Dyarchy was altogether abandoned
C. Dyarchy was introduced in the centre
D. None of the above

A. Be a unitary state
B. Be a federal state
C. Have parliamentary form of Government
D. Have presidential form of Government
E. Be a limited monarchy

A. 1929
B. 1930
C. 1931
D. 1932
E. 1933

A. 1929
B. 1930
C. 1931
D. 1932

A. Moti Lal Nehru
B. Jawahar Lal Nehru
C. Dr. Jayakar
D. Sir Tej Bahadur Sapru
E. B.K. Nehru

A. Secretary of State so desired
B. Governor General so wished
C. Muslim League did not wish
D. Congress wanted an assurance that the Governors will act as constitutional heads
E. Congress leadership did not wish to assume responsibility

A. Introducing dyarchy in the provinces
B. Introducing dyarchy in the centre
C. Integration of Indian States
D. Introducing communalism in India
E. Introducing provincial autonomy

A. The Act of 1919 was much below the expectations of the people
B. The bureaucracy was not elastic under the Act of 1919
C. The system of dyarchy proved unworkable
D. Report of Hunter Committee encouraged people towards British Government
E. Gandhiji’s non-cooperation movement had mass appeal