A. J.L.Nehru
B. Ananthaswamy Ayyangar
C. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel
D. Dr. Rajindra Parsad
Related Mcqs:
- In the case of Constituent Assembly’s dissolution the Federal Court set the judgment of the Sind Court aside on the technical ground that the Act by virtue of which the Sind Court issued the verdict was ‘not yet a law’ because it had not received the assent of:
A. Federal Court
B. Prime Minister
C. Governor-General
D. Law Minister - All members of the Constituent Assembly will be Indians was provided:
A. In August Offer (1940)
B. Cripps Proposals
C. Wavel Plan
D. Cabinet Mission Proposals - What was the judgment of sindh chief court in dissolution of Constituent Assembly case?
A. Dissolution is valid
B. It refer the case to the Federal Court
C. Dissolution was ultra vires and void
D. It dismiss the petition - On 10th August 1947 the first Constituent Assembly met. Which of the following job(s) was/were assigned to the Constituent Assembly?
A. Of framing the constitution
B. To act as Federal Parliament, until the constitution came into effect
C. Both of these
D. None of these - In the Constituent Assembly, it was said that Parliament of the Federation shall consist of the President and what else:
A. National Legislature
B. National Assembly
C. House of people
D. Council of State - One of the serious defects of Regulating Act, 1773 was that it did not define the relationship of Supreme Court with:
A. Board of Directors in England
B. Board of Control in England
C. British Parliament
D. Governor-General in India
E. Provincial Governors - The 1st Constitution Assembly of Pakistan was dissolved by the Governor-General by a Proclamation dated the 24th of October, 1954 and a reconstituted Council of Ministers was set up. The President of the Constituent Assembly Maulvi Tamiz-ud-Din Khan, thereupon filed a writ petition under which section Maulvi Tamiz-ud-Din Khan file this petition?
A. 224-A of the Government of India Act, 1935
B. 225-A of the Government of India Act, 1935
C. 223-A of the Government of India Act, 1935
D. 228-A of the Government of India Act, 1935 - Who said in his judgment that no part of our Constitution is unamendble?
A. Allahabad High Court
B. Calcutta High Court
C. Madras High Court
D. Supreme Court of India - What was the advice of Federal Court to the Governor-General in the case of dissolution of Constituent Assembly?
A. Form a second Constituent Assembly immediately
B. Hold election for a second Assembly
C. Change the Constituent Assembly into the Legislature
D. Form a second Assembly within three months - What was the decision of Federal Court in the dissolution case of Constituent Assembly?
A. It upheld Governor-General’s decision
B. It upheld the Sindh Chief Court’s decision
C. It upheld the Sindh Chief Court’s decision
D. It ordered to re-constitute in Assembly